BEEZ vs. FTAG
BEEZ (Honeytree U.S. Equity ETF) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BEEZ is actively managed, while FTAG is passively managed. Over the past year, BEEZ returned 2.20% vs 14.00% for FTAG. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEEZ charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.
Performance
BEEZ vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEEZ achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than FTAG's 10.75% return.
BEEZ
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTAG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
BEEZ vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BEEZ Honeytree U.S. Equity ETF | 0.73% | 5.65% | 10.41% | 14.28% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 10.75% | 14.82% | -6.72% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEEZ and FTAG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between BEEZ and FTAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEEZ vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank
BEEZ
FTAG
BEEZ vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Honeytree U.S. Equity ETF (BEEZ) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEEZ | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.18 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.52 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 3.75 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEEZ | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 1.01 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | -0.33 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
BEEZ vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEEZ drawdown since its inception was -18.62%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEEZ and FTAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEEZ | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.62% | -90.89% | +72.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | -9.25% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.77% | -78.58% | +74.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -71.24% | +68.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.74% | -1.02% |
Volatility
BEEZ vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison
Honeytree U.S. Equity ETF (BEEZ) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) at 3.47%. This indicates that BEEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEEZ | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 3.47% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 10.53% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 13.93% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 17.38% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 19.66% | -4.60% |
BEEZ vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEEZ has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEEZ vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison
BEEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FTAG's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEEZ Honeytree U.S. Equity ETF | 0.55% | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.37% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEEZ and FTAG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEEZ has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to FTAG (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEEZ dropped -18.62% vs FTAG's -90.89%.
On 1-year performance, FTAG leads with 14.00% vs 2.20% for BEEZ. On fees, BEEZ is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, FTAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTAG has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEEZ is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.55% for BEEZ.
They also come from different issuers: Honeytree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for BEEZ and 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEEZ and FTAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer