PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEEX vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEEX vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The BeeHive ETF (BEEX) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEEX achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.


BEEX

1D
-0.77%
1M
1.92%
YTD
4.75%
6M
4.85%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAOS

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.69%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEEX vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BEEX
The BeeHive ETF
4.75%14.48%-2.67%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.82%2.55%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BEEX and CAOS is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEEX vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEEX
BEEX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEEX vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The BeeHive ETF (BEEX) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BEEXCAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.49

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.76

6.22

-0.47

BEEX vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEEX and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BEEXCAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.24

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.21

-0.46

Drawdowns

BEEX vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEEX drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEEX and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEEXCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-3.60%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-0.76%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.07%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-0.90%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

0.30%

+2.72%

Volatility

BEEX vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

The BeeHive ETF (BEEX) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that BEEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEEXCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

0.26%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

1.03%

+7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

1.52%

+9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

4.26%

+10.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

4.26%

+10.73%

BEEX vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEEX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

BEEX vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

BEEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BEEX
The BeeHive ETF
0.33%0.35%0.27%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BEEX and CAOS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEEX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEEX dropped -15.13% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

On 1-year performance, BEEX leads with 17.36% vs 1.88% for CAOS. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BEEX has performed better with a 17.36% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for BEEX.

BEEX has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

BEEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: BeeHive and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for BEEX and 0.63% for CAOS.

BEEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEEX and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer