BEDZ vs. TRUD
BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) and TRUD (VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BEDZ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TRUD.
Performance
BEDZ vs. TRUD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than TRUD's 0.20% return.
BEDZ
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 18.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
TRUD
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $65.74K | $44.95K | $74.21K | |
| $4.45M | $2.54M | $1.74M |
BEDZ vs. TRUD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 11.91% | 2.76% |
TRUD VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF | 0.20% | 6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDZ and TRUD is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.57 |
BEDZ vs. TRUD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BEDZ
TRUD
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
BEDZ
TRUD
-
Consumer Cyclical
BEDZ
TRUD
Industrials
BEDZ
TRUD
Communication Services
BEDZ
TRUD
Basic Materials
BEDZ
-
TRUD
-
Consumer Defensive
BEDZ
-
TRUD
-
Energy
BEDZ
-
TRUD
-
Financial Services
BEDZ
-
TRUD
Healthcare
BEDZ
-
TRUD
-
Technology
BEDZ
-
TRUD
Utilities
BEDZ
-
TRUD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDZ vs. TRUD — Risk / Return Rank
BEDZ
TRUD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BEDZ vs. TRUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDZ | TRUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDZ vs. TRUD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than TRUD's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and TRUD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDZ | TRUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.70% | -15.96% | -13.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -4.73% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -4.76% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | — | — |
Volatility
BEDZ vs. TRUD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDZ | TRUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.40% | 22.23% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 22.23% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 22.23% | +2.43% |
BEDZ vs. TRUD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUD's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDZ vs. TRUD - Dividend Comparison
BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than TRUD's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.06% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
TRUD VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF | 0.48% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDZ and TRUD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.
BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.48% for TRUD.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEDZ and 0.16% for TRUD.
Find the right allocation for BEDZ and TRUD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer