BEDY vs. USFR
BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BEDY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. BEDY is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
BEDY vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return.
BEDY
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
BEDY vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 12.74% | 1.45% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.78% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDY and USFR is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDY vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
BEDY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USFR
BEDY vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDY | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 13.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 200.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 775.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDY vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDY | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -1.36% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -0.15% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
BEDY vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDY | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 0.27% | +11.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 0.40% | +11.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 0.78% | +11.37% |
BEDY vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDY vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.28% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDY and USFR have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BEDY.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.28% for BEDY.
BEDY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 0.15% for USFR.
Find the right allocation for BEDY and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer