BEDY vs. DFRA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA).

BEDY and DFRA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BEDY is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025. DFRA is a passively managed fund by Donoghue Forlines that tracks the performance of the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 13, 2021.

Performance

BEDY vs. DFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BEDY vs. DFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	3.56%	1.62%
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF	10.68%	-0.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than DFRA's 10.68% return.

BEDY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFRA

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -5.53%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 11.86%
• 1Y: 16.10%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEDY vs. DFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DFRA's 0.69% expense ratio.

DFRA

Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF

BEDY

BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

Return for Risk

BEDY vs. DFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFRA

DFRA Risk / Return Rank: 42
DFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
DFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEDY vs. DFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEDY	DFRA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.73	+0.72

Correlation

The correlation between BEDY and DFRA is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BEDY vs. DFRA - Dividend Comparison

BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than DFRA's 4.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	2.14%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF	4.12%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%

Drawdowns

BEDY vs. DFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum DFRA drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and DFRA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDY	DFRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-19.35%	+13.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.99%	-5.53%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.55%	-3.91%	+2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEDY	DFRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.42%	18.56%	-6.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.42%	17.59%	-5.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.42%	17.59%	-5.17%