BEDY vs. BKGI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEDY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.

Performance

BEDY vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than BKGI's 12.20% return.

BEDY

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKGI

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 6M: 12.27%
• 1Y: 21.78%
• 3Y*: 22.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEDY vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	10.40%	1.62%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	12.20%	0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BEDY and BKGI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

BEDY vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 59
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEDY vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEDY	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.27	1.61	+0.66

Drawdowns

BEDY vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum BKGI drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and BKGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDY	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-14.79%	+8.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-3.14%	+2.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-2.57%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEDY	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	11.59%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.98%	14.07%	-2.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.98%	14.07%	-2.09%

BEDY vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEDY vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than BKGI's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	3.35%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.69%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEDY and BKGI in my portfolio?

BEDY and BKGI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BEDY or BKGI?

On fees, BEDY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEDY or BKGI?

BEDY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEDY or BKGI?

BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.69% for BKGI.

What is the main difference between BEDY and BKGI?

BEDY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BKGI is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 0.65% for BKGI.