BE vs. SN
BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and SN (SharkNinja Inc.) are both stocks. BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while SN operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, BE returned 1085.51% vs 62.91% for SN. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BE vs. SN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 199.48% return, which is significantly higher than SN's 19.57% return.
BE
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -5.70%
- YTD
- 199.48%
- 6M
- 173.97%
- 1Y
- 1,085.51%
- 3Y*
- 145.16%
- 5Y*
- 59.08%
- 10Y*
- —
SN
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 26.67%
- YTD
- 19.57%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 62.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BE vs. SN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 199.48% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -14.75% |
SN SharkNinja Inc. | 19.57% | 14.93% | 90.27% | 74.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and SN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
BE:
$83.19B
SN:
$19.05B
BE:
$0.02
SN:
$4.96
BE:
11.33K
SN:
26.97
BE:
27.91
SN:
3.67
BE:
90.28
SN:
6.89
BE:
$2.45B
SN:
$5.18B
BE:
$761.91M
SN:
$3.22B
BE:
$88.83M
SN:
$1.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BE vs. SN — Risk / Return Rank
BE
SN
BE vs. SN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and SharkNinja Inc. (SN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BE | SN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.22 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.53 | 1.73 | +21.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.01 | 3.85 | +69.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BE vs. SN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than SN's maximum drawdown of -42.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and SN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BE | SN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -42.64% | -49.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -30.23% | -15.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -1.32% | -14.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -9.32% | -42.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.78% | 13.61% | +1.17% |
Volatility
BE vs. SN - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 27.74% compared to SharkNinja Inc. (SN) at 13.91%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BE | SN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.74% | 13.91% | +13.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.65% | 31.21% | +44.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.62% | 42.33% | +65.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.95% | 54.51% | +31.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.68% | 54.51% | +41.17% |
Dividends
BE vs. SN - Dividend Comparison
Neither BE nor SN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SN SharkNinja Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.11% |
Financials
BE vs. SN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and SharkNinja Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BE and SN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (27.74%) compared to SN (13.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs SN's -42.64%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.05 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BE and SN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer