PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BE vs. AU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BE vs. AU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 199.48% return, which is significantly higher than AU's 4.15% return.


BE

1D
4.56%
1M
-10.19%
YTD
199.48%
6M
173.97%
1Y
1,069.53%
3Y*
145.16%
5Y*
59.08%
10Y*

AU

1D
3.75%
1M
-14.67%
YTD
4.15%
6M
7.11%
1Y
86.54%
3Y*
58.20%
5Y*
35.46%
10Y*
20.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BE vs. AU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
199.48%291.22%50.07%-22.59%-12.81%-23.48%283.67%-25.15%-46.63%
AU
AngloGold Ashanti Limited
4.15%288.18%25.43%-2.68%-5.09%-4.87%1.90%78.89%52.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BE and AU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BE:

$83.19B

AU:

$43.57B

EPS

BE:

$0.02

AU:

$6.85

PE Ratio

BE:

11.33K

AU:

12.59

PS Ratio

BE:

27.91

AU:

3.92

PB Ratio

BE:

90.28

AU:

5.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

BE:

$2.45B

AU:

$11.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BE:

$761.91M

AU:

$5.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

BE:

$88.83M

AU:

$5.58B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BE vs. AU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE
BE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

AU
AU Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AU Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BE vs. AU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.26

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

23.53

2.35

+21.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

73.01

6.18

+66.83

BE vs. AU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 10.05, which is higher than the AU Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and AU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BE vs. AU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, roughly equal to the maximum AU drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and AU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-90.12%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.94%

-37.03%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.42%

-38.71%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.87%

-51.75%

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.48%

-30.75%

+15.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-46.07%

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.78%

14.04%

+0.74%

Volatility

BE vs. AU - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 27.74% compared to AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) at 21.02%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.74%

21.02%

+6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.65%

46.50%

+29.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.62%

58.45%

+49.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.95%

49.13%

+36.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.68%

49.79%

+45.89%

Dividends

BE vs. AU - Dividend Comparison

BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AU
AngloGold Ashanti Limited
5.33%2.96%1.78%1.14%2.26%2.58%0.49%0.30%0.48%0.93%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BE vs. AU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and AngloGold Ashanti Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
751.05M
3.24B
(BE) Total Revenue
(AU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BE vs. AU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloom Energy Corporation and AngloGold Ashanti Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
30.0%
58.2%
Portfolio components
BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

AU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 3.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

AU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.8%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

AU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BE and AU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BE has higher volatility (27.74%) compared to AU (21.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs AU's -90.12%.

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.05 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BE and AU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer