BE vs. APLD
BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and APLD (Applied Digital Corporation) are both stocks. BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while APLD operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 5 years, BE returned 59.08%/yr vs 112.30%/yr for APLD. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BE vs. APLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 199.48% return, which is significantly higher than APLD's 74.14% return.
BE
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -5.70%
- YTD
- 199.48%
- 6M
- 173.97%
- 1Y
- 1,085.51%
- 3Y*
- 145.16%
- 5Y*
- 59.08%
- 10Y*
- —
APLD
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 74.14%
- 6M
- 53.27%
- 1Y
- 281.93%
- 3Y*
- 69.23%
- 5Y*
- 112.30%
- 10Y*
- 125.13%
BE vs. APLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 199.48% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -46.63% |
APLD Applied Digital Corporation | 74.14% | 220.94% | 13.35% | 266.30% | -56.09% | 11,789.90% | 389.44% | -34.55% | -18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and APLD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, BE and APLD have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BE:
$83.19B
APLD:
$11.60B
BE:
$0.02
APLD:
-$0.72
BE:
27.91
APLD:
28.94
BE:
90.28
APLD:
7.37
BE:
$2.45B
APLD:
$390.57M
BE:
$761.91M
APLD:
$124.93M
BE:
$88.83M
APLD:
-$154.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BE vs. APLD — Risk / Return Rank
BE
APLD
BE vs. APLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BE | APLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.33 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.53 | 4.83 | +18.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.01 | 11.72 | +61.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BE vs. APLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, smaller than the maximum APLD drawdown of -99.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and APLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BE | APLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -99.73% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -50.31% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.42% | -76.66% | +23.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.87% | -82.61% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -14.00% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -74.86% | +22.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.78% | 21.22% | -6.44% |
Volatility
BE vs. APLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is 27.74%, while Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a volatility of 33.15%. This indicates that BE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BE | APLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.74% | 33.15% | -5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.65% | 80.49% | -4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.62% | 107.13% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.95% | 165.20% | -79.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.68% | 301.46% | -205.78% |
Dividends
BE vs. APLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither BE nor APLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BE vs. APLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Applied Digital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BE vs. APLD - Profitability Comparison
BE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
APLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 82.52M and revenue of 161.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.
BE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
APLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported an operating income of -62.13M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.4%.
BE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
APLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a net income of -104.11M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in a net margin of -64.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BE and APLD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APLD has higher volatility (33.15%) compared to BE (27.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs APLD's -99.73%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.05 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BE and APLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer