BDRY vs. USE
BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) and USE (USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund) are both Commodities funds. BDRY is passively managed, while USE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BDRY returned 27.14%/yr vs 17.85%/yr for USE. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDRY charges 3.76%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for USE.
Performance
BDRY vs. USE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDRY achieves a 43.90% return, which is significantly lower than USE's 48.69% return.
BDRY
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 43.90%
- 6M
- 35.70%
- 1Y
- 142.69%
- 3Y*
- 27.14%
- 5Y*
- -11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
USE
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- 48.69%
- 6M
- 51.72%
- 1Y
- 41.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDRY vs. USE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 43.90% | 44.24% | -47.40% | 45.78% |
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund | 48.69% | -14.97% | 22.58% | 9.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDRY and USE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2023 | 0.01 |
BDRY vs. USE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDRY
USE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BDRY
USE
Basic Materials
BDRY
-
USE
-
Communication Services
BDRY
-
USE
-
Consumer Cyclical
BDRY
-
USE
-
Consumer Defensive
BDRY
-
USE
-
Energy
BDRY
-
USE
-
Healthcare
BDRY
-
USE
-
Industrials
BDRY
-
USE
-
Real Estate
BDRY
-
USE
-
Technology
BDRY
-
USE
-
Utilities
BDRY
-
USE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDRY vs. USE — Risk / Return Rank
BDRY
USE
BDRY vs. USE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDRY | USE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.40 | 1.32 | +2.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | 1.94 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.23 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.65 | 1.58 | +5.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.36 | 3.10 | +16.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDRY | USE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40 | 1.32 | +2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.70 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
BDRY vs. USE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDRY drawdown since its inception was -89.16%, which is greater than USE's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDRY and USE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDRY | USE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.16% | -26.24% | -62.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.60% | -26.24% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.71% | -26.24% | -43.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.60% | -4.44% | -65.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.38% | -7.96% | -50.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 13.32% | -5.92% |
Volatility
BDRY vs. USE - Volatility Comparison
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) have volatilities of 11.26% and 11.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDRY | USE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 11.11% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.02% | 25.86% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.29% | 31.46% | +10.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.70% | 27.06% | +33.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.58% | 27.06% | +35.52% |
BDRY vs. USE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDRY has a 3.76% expense ratio, which is higher than USE's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDRY vs. USE - Dividend Comparison
BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund | 2.06% | 3.06% | 38.65% | 4.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDRY and USE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDRY has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to USE (11.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDRY dropped -89.16% vs USE's -26.24%.
On 3-year performance, BDRY leads with 27.14% vs 17.85% for USE. On fees, USE is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, USE has been the lower-risk option at 11.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BDRY has performed better with a 27.14% return vs 17.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USE is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
USE has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and USCF. Their fees differ too: 3.76% for BDRY and 0.79% for USE.
BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDRY and USE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer