PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDMIX vs. EDEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDMIX vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDMIX achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's -3.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BDMIX has underperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 8.42%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.


BDMIX

1D
1.05%
1M
2.20%
YTD
11.73%
6M
13.28%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
8.42%

EDEN

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-3.05%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
-6.97%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDMIX vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
11.73%18.30%21.39%14.55%1.80%3.34%0.29%-0.85%2.20%12.85%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
-3.05%10.58%-3.94%17.99%-11.47%14.81%42.56%24.37%-14.43%35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BDMIX and EDEN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDMIX vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDMIX
BDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EDEN
EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDMIX vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BDMIXEDENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

0.96

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.70

-0.33

+7.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

-0.72

+19.06

BDMIX vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDMIX and EDEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BDMIX vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDMIX drawdown since its inception was -11.89%, smaller than the maximum EDEN drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDMIX and EDEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDMIXEDENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-36.61%

+24.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-21.17%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.07%

-29.31%

+25.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.99%

-36.61%

+30.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.44%

-36.61%

+27.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-13.55%

+12.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-7.37%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

10.27%

-9.09%

Volatility

BDMIX vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX) is 2.69%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that BDMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDMIXEDENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

4.93%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

15.72%

-10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.07%

20.90%

-13.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

20.25%

-13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

19.41%

-13.57%

BDMIX vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDMIX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDMIX vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

BDMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than EDEN's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
8.00%8.94%13.26%7.42%0.00%1.23%0.30%6.78%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.86%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
2.87%2.79%1.50%1.92%1.47%0.74%0.42%2.36%2.01%2.03%1.28%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDMIX and EDEN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDEN has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to BDMIX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDMIX dropped -11.89% vs EDEN's -36.61%.

BDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDMIX and EDEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer