BDIV vs. LCS.TO
BDIV (AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AAM, while LCS.TO (Brompton Lifeco Split Corp.) is a stock. Over the past year, BDIV returned 20.21% vs 60.88% for LCS.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDIV vs. LCS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BDIV is traded in USD, while LCS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LCS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDIV achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than LCS.TO's 19.77% return.
BDIV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 20.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCS.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 6M
- 34.88%
- 1Y
- 60.88%
- 3Y*
- 50.24%
- 5Y*
- 27.91%
- 10Y*
- 22.16%
BDIV vs. LCS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF | 7.27% | 18.59% | 3.14% |
LCS.TO Brompton Lifeco Split Corp. | 19.77% | 50.07% | 42.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDIV and LCS.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDIV vs. LCS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BDIV
LCS.TO
BDIV vs. LCS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and Brompton Lifeco Split Corp. (LCS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDIV | LCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.88 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.07 | 3.67 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.50 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.91 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 12.86 | -1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDIV | LCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.88 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.29 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
BDIV vs. LCS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDIV drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum LCS.TO drawdown of -84.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV and LCS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDIV | LCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -84.02% | +69.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -15.64% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.73% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | -25.56% | +23.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 4.75% | -2.99% |
Volatility
BDIV vs. LCS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is 2.35%, while Brompton Lifeco Split Corp. (LCS.TO) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that BDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDIV | LCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 4.36% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 17.39% | -10.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 21.31% | -11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 39.77% | -26.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 51.38% | -37.97% |
Dividends
BDIV vs. LCS.TO - Dividend Comparison
BDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than LCS.TO's 7.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF | 1.59% | 1.14% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCS.TO Brompton Lifeco Split Corp. | 7.57% | 8.14% | 9.34% | 14.09% | 6.77% | 11.99% | 4.00% | 6.02% | 24.64% | 12.59% | 3.78% | 15.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDIV and LCS.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BDIV and LCS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer