BDEC vs. POCT
BDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BDEC tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index December while POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDEC returned 10.16%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BDEC vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDEC achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.33% return.
BDEC
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
BDEC vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 7.48% | 14.96% | 12.71% | 19.86% | -9.42% | 15.45% | 13.39% | 2.40% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.33% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 10.40% | 1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDEC and POCT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BDEC and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BDEC vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDEC
POCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BDEC
POCT
Financial Services
BDEC
POCT
Communication Services
BDEC
POCT
Consumer Cyclical
BDEC
POCT
Healthcare
BDEC
POCT
Industrials
BDEC
POCT
Consumer Defensive
BDEC
POCT
Energy
BDEC
POCT
Utilities
BDEC
POCT
Real Estate
BDEC
POCT
Basic Materials
BDEC
POCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDEC vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
BDEC
POCT
BDEC vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDEC | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 3.28 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.88 | 16.84 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDEC | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.35 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 1.24 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
BDEC vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDEC drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDEC and POCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDEC | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -18.80% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.52% | -4.40% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.95% | -10.22% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | -10.22% | -6.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.20% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.05% | -1.50% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 0.86% | +0.50% |
Volatility
BDEC vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 0.94%. This indicates that BDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDEC | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 0.94% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.34% | 4.77% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.78% | 6.17% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 7.94% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 10.22% | +4.05% |
BDEC vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BDEC and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BDEC vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BDEC nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BDEC and POCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BDEC has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to POCT (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDEC dropped -25.60% vs POCT's -18.80%.
On 5-year performance, BDEC leads with 10.16% vs 9.82% for POCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BDEC has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BDEC and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BDEC and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BDEC tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index December, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index.
BDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDEC and POCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer