PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDEC vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BDEC vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BDEC vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
-2.53%14.96%12.71%19.86%-9.42%15.45%13.39%2.40%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
-0.60%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%7.51%1.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDEC achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than PJUL's -0.60% return.


BDEC

1D
0.63%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-2.53%
6M
0.46%
1Y
15.15%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*

PJUL

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
1.12%
1Y
14.39%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BDEC vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BDEC and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

BDEC vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDEC
BDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDEC vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDECPJULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.43

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

2.17

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.12

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.45

11.94

-3.49

BDEC vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDEC and PJUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDECPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.43

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.11

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.83

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BDEC and PJUL is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BDEC vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BDEC nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Drawdowns

BDEC vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDEC drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, which is greater than PJUL's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDEC and PJUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BDECPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-18.17%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-6.99%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.44%

-10.69%

-5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-1.68%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-1.50%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.24%

+0.58%

Volatility

BDEC vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 2.93%. This indicates that BDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BDECPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

2.93%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

4.17%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.47%

10.09%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.94%

8.58%

+3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

10.12%

+4.28%