PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDEC vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDEC vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDEC achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's 4.74% return.


BDEC

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.22%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.80%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

PJUL

1D
0.10%
1M
1.44%
YTD
4.74%
6M
5.40%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDEC vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
7.48%14.96%12.71%19.86%-9.42%15.45%13.39%2.40%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
4.74%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%7.51%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BDEC and PJUL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.90

The correlation between BDEC and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BDEC vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDEC
PJUL

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BDEC
36.2%
PJUL
36.2%

Financial Services

BDEC
11.9%
PJUL
11.9%

Communication Services

BDEC
10.9%
PJUL
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BDEC
10.1%
PJUL
10.1%

Healthcare

BDEC
8.4%
PJUL
8.4%

Industrials

BDEC
8.1%
PJUL
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

BDEC
4.9%
PJUL
4.9%

Energy

BDEC
3.5%
PJUL
3.5%

Utilities

BDEC
2.3%
PJUL
2.3%

Real Estate

BDEC
1.9%
PJUL
1.9%

Basic Materials

BDEC
1.8%
PJUL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDEC vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDEC
BDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDEC vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDECPJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.59

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

4.22

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.88

23.24

-7.36

BDEC vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDEC and PJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDECPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.73

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

1.23

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.90

-0.09

Drawdowns

BDEC vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDEC drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, which is greater than PJUL's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDEC and PJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDECPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-18.17%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.52%

-3.64%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.95%

-10.69%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.44%

-10.69%

-5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-1.47%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

0.66%

+0.70%

Volatility

BDEC vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 0.42%. This indicates that BDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDECPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

0.42%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

3.89%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

5.66%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.96%

8.60%

+3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.27%

10.03%

+4.24%

BDEC vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BDEC and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

BDEC vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BDEC nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BDEC and PJUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BDEC has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to PJUL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDEC dropped -25.60% vs PJUL's -18.17%.

On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.49% vs 10.16% for BDEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BDEC and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

BDEC and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BDEC tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index December, while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July.

PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDEC and PJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer