BDEC vs. FFTY
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY).
BDEC and FFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDEC is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index December. It was launched on Nov 29, 2019. FFTY is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the IBD 50 Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2015. Both BDEC and FFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BDEC vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BDEC vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | -3.15% | 14.96% | 12.71% | 19.86% | -9.42% | 15.45% | 13.39% | 2.40% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | -4.02% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -51.08% | 11.92% | 18.20% | -0.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDEC achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's -4.02% return.
BDEC
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 14.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- -18.29%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -9.38%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- -4.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BDEC vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BDEC vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
BDEC
FFTY
BDEC vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDEC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.74 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 1.14 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.04 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 3.05 | +5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDEC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.74 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.16 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.12 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between BDEC and FFTY is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BDEC vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
BDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.40% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Drawdowns
BDEC vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDEC drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDEC and FFTY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDEC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -59.46% | +33.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -23.29% | +14.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | -59.46% | +43.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | -32.35% | +27.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -22.38% | +19.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 7.97% | -6.16% |
Volatility
BDEC vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) is 3.90%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 14.46%. This indicates that BDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BDEC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 14.46% | -10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.20% | 28.72% | -21.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 34.49% | -21.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 29.00% | -17.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 27.17% | -12.77% |