BDEC vs. BJAN
BDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December) and BJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BDEC tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index December while BJAN tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDEC returned 9.81%/yr vs 10.36%/yr for BJAN. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BDEC vs. BJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDEC achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly higher than BJAN's 5.69% return.
BDEC
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
BJAN
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- —
BDEC vs. BJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 6.04% | 14.96% | 12.71% | 19.86% | -9.42% | 15.45% | 13.39% | 1.55% |
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 5.69% | 14.81% | 17.36% | 23.66% | -11.40% | 13.86% | 12.54% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDEC and BJAN is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BDEC and BJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
BDEC vs. BJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDEC
BJAN
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BDEC
BJAN
Financial Services
BDEC
BJAN
Communication Services
BDEC
BJAN
Consumer Cyclical
BDEC
BJAN
Healthcare
BDEC
BJAN
Industrials
BDEC
BJAN
Consumer Defensive
BDEC
BJAN
Energy
BDEC
BJAN
Utilities
BDEC
BJAN
Real Estate
BDEC
BJAN
Basic Materials
BDEC
BJAN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDEC vs. BJAN — Risk / Return Rank
BDEC
BJAN
BDEC vs. BJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDEC | BJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.99 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 15.01 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDEC | BJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.41 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.87 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.91 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
BDEC vs. BJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDEC drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, roughly equal to the maximum BJAN drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDEC and BJAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDEC | BJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -26.86% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.52% | -6.27% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.95% | -13.81% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | -17.38% | +0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -1.47% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.05% | -2.90% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 1.24% | +0.13% |
Volatility
BDEC vs. BJAN - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) at 1.84%. This indicates that BDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDEC | BJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.94% | 1.84% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 6.23% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.87% | 7.78% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 11.99% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 14.06% | +0.20% |
BDEC vs. BJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BDEC and BJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BDEC vs. BJAN - Dividend Comparison
Neither BDEC nor BJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BDEC and BJAN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BDEC has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to BJAN (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDEC dropped -25.60% vs BJAN's -26.86%.
On 5-year performance, BJAN leads with 10.36% vs 9.81% for BDEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BJAN has performed better with a 10.36% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BDEC and BJAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BDEC and BJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BDEC tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index December, while BJAN tracks S&P 500.
BJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDEC and BJAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer