PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDEC vs. APRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDEC vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDEC achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than APRB's 4.77% return.


BDEC

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.22%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.80%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

APRB

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.69%
YTD
4.77%
6M
5.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDEC vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDEC and APRB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDEC vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDEC
BDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

APRB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDEC vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDECAPRBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.88

BDEC vs. APRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDECAPRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

2.00

-1.19

Drawdowns

BDEC vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDEC drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDEC and APRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDECAPRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-4.59%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.11%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-0.74%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

Volatility

BDEC vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDECAPRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

5.98%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.96%

5.98%

+5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.27%

5.98%

+8.29%

BDEC vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDEC vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BDEC nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BDEC and APRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BDEC.

BDEC and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BDEC and 0.25% for APRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDEC and APRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer