BDCZ vs. PBEU
BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) and PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - BDCZ tracks the BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index while PBEU tracks the BITA European Banks Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBEU.
Performance
BDCZ vs. PBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCZ achieves a -7.98% return, which is significantly lower than PBEU's 6.67% return.
BDCZ
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- -7.98%
- 6M
- -8.99%
- 1Y
- -10.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.23%
PBEU
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDCZ vs. PBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | -7.98% | 1.24% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 6.67% | 11.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCZ and PBEU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCZ vs. PBEU — Risk / Return Rank
BDCZ
PBEU
BDCZ vs. PBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDCZ | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDCZ | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.45 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
BDCZ vs. PBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCZ drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, which is greater than PBEU's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCZ and PBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCZ | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.63% | -17.26% | -38.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.27% | -2.18% | -15.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -4.23% | -3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.94% | — | — |
Volatility
BDCZ vs. PBEU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCZ | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 27.88% | -7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 27.88% | -10.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 27.88% | -6.15% |
BDCZ vs. PBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PBEU's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCZ vs. PBEU - Dividend Comparison
BDCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, more than PBEU's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | 11.28% | 10.65% | 9.26% | 9.13% | 9.39% | 7.49% | 10.01% | 8.40% | 9.66% | 8.74% | 7.98% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCZ and PBEU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBEU is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBEU is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDCZ.
BDCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.28%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.
BDCZ tracks BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BDCZ and 0.13% for PBEU.
Find the right allocation for BDCZ and PBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer