BDCX vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BDCX returned -18.23% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.24 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

BDCX vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -10.75% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

BDCX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -2.20%
• 6M: -9.86%
• YTD: -10.75%
• 1Y: -18.23%
• 3Y*: 0.23%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.61%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	$38.67K	$35.86K	$42.25K
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

BDCX vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	-10.75%	-10.42%	9.26%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCX and SBIT is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.24

Return for Risk

BDCX vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BDCX

BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 3
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BDCX vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDCX	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	1.27	-1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.89	1.95	-2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.23	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	2.35	-3.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	5.19	-6.47

BDCX vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDCX and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BDCX vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDCX	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.96%	-91.35%	+56.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.35%	-47.94%	+21.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.46%	-77.87%	+50.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.50%	-69.07%	+58.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.28%	21.67%	-6.39%

Volatility

BDCX vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) is 7.16%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that BDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDCX	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	18.09%	-10.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.67%	67.10%	-44.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.36%	88.65%	-60.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.69%	96.10%	-69.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.87%	96.10%	-69.23%

BDCX vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BDCX and SBIT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

BDCX vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.64%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	21.64%	19.17%	15.28%	14.71%	17.47%	11.52%	6.32%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDCX and SBIT in my portfolio?

BDCX and SBIT have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDCX or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to BDCX (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, BDCX or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs -18.23% for BDCX. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BDCX has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDCX or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs -18.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDCX or SBIT?

BDCX and SBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDCX or SBIT?

BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 21.64%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between BDCX and SBIT?

BDCX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: UBS and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.