PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDCX vs. CSWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDCX vs. CSWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than CSWC's 11.42% return.


BDCX

1D
-0.27%
1M
-7.16%
YTD
-8.64%
6M
-8.85%
1Y
-13.87%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*

CSWC

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
11.42%
6M
17.36%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
17.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCX vs. CSWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
-8.64%-10.42%15.32%35.33%-17.67%52.70%24.50%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
11.42%14.28%2.14%56.10%-24.63%57.40%31.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCX and CSWC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.70

The correlation between BDCX and CSWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDCX vs. CSWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCX
BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CSWC
CSWC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CSWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCX vs. CSWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDCXCSWCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

1.63

-2.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.60

2.36

-2.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.29

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

1.87

-2.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.88

6.08

-6.96

BDCX vs. CSWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the CSWC Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDCX and CSWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDCXCSWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

1.63

-2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.41

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.39

+0.07

Drawdowns

BDCX vs. CSWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum CSWC drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and CSWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDCXCSWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-68.33%

+33.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.46%

-15.75%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.39%

-27.74%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.96%

-33.66%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.75%

-2.09%

-23.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-18.37%

+8.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.06%

4.86%

+12.20%

Volatility

BDCX vs. CSWC - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) at 5.00%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDCXCSWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

5.00%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.02%

13.87%

+8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

18.83%

+8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.44%

22.64%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

27.39%

-0.54%

Dividends

BDCX vs. CSWC - Dividend Comparison

BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, more than CSWC's 12.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
19.59%19.17%15.28%14.71%17.47%11.52%6.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
12.49%11.56%11.59%10.21%12.46%10.13%11.49%13.07%10.77%7.01%2.35%216.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDCX and CSWC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDCX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to CSWC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs CSWC's -68.33%.

CSWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDCX and CSWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer