BDCX vs. CSWC
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while CSWC (Capital Southwest Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BDCX returned 2.33%/yr vs 9.27%/yr for CSWC. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BDCX vs. CSWC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than CSWC's 11.42% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- -13.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CSWC
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 17.36%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 17.26%
BDCX vs. CSWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -8.64% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 24.50% |
CSWC Capital Southwest Corporation | 11.42% | 14.28% | 2.14% | 56.10% | -24.63% | 57.40% | 31.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and CSWC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BDCX and CSWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. CSWC — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
CSWC
BDCX vs. CSWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDCX | CSWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | 1.63 | -2.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | 2.36 | -2.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.29 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 1.87 | -2.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 6.08 | -6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDCX | CSWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | 1.63 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.39 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. CSWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum CSWC drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and CSWC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | CSWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -68.33% | +33.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -15.75% | -14.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | -27.74% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -33.66% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | -2.09% | -23.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -18.37% | +8.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.06% | 4.86% | +12.20% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. CSWC - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) at 5.00%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | CSWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.00% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 13.87% | +8.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 18.83% | +8.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 22.64% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 27.39% | -0.54% |
Dividends
BDCX vs. CSWC - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, more than CSWC's 12.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 19.59% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSWC Capital Southwest Corporation | 12.49% | 11.56% | 11.59% | 10.21% | 12.46% | 10.13% | 11.49% | 13.07% | 10.77% | 7.01% | 2.35% | 216.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and CSWC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to CSWC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs CSWC's -68.33%.
CSWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and CSWC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer