BDCX vs. CSWC
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while CSWC (Capital Southwest Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BDCX returned 2.22%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for CSWC. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
BDCX vs. CSWC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -10.75% return, which is significantly lower than CSWC's 13.50% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- YTD
- -10.75%
- 1Y
- -18.23%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.61%
CSWC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 17.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 16.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.67K | $35.86K | $42.25K | |
| $14.98M | $15.10M | $15.36M |
BDCX vs. CSWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -10.75% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 25.40% |
CSWC Capital Southwest Corporation | 13.50% | 14.28% | 2.14% | 56.10% | -24.63% | 57.40% | 35.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and CSWC is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BDCX and CSWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. CSWC — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
CSWC
BDCX vs. CSWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDCX | CSWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.15 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.01 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 3.24 | -4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. CSWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum CSWC drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and CSWC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | CSWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -68.33% | +33.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.35% | -15.75% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | -27.74% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -33.66% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | -2.92% | -24.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -18.29% | +7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.28% | 4.90% | +10.38% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. CSWC - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) at 4.33%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | CSWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 4.33% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.67% | 13.19% | +9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 19.04% | +9.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.69% | 22.21% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 27.40% | -0.53% |
Dividends
BDCX vs. CSWC - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.64%, more than CSWC's 10.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 21.64% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSWC Capital Southwest Corporation | 10.86% | 11.56% | 11.59% | 10.21% | 12.46% | 10.13% | 11.49% | 13.07% | 10.77% | 7.01% | 2.35% | 216.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and CSWC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to CSWC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs CSWC's -68.33%.
CSWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and CSWC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer