BDBT vs. STRN

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend 25 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while STRN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by SmartWay. Both are actively managed. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BDBT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.

Performance

BDBT vs. STRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and SMART Trend 25 ETF (STRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than STRN's 23.95% return.

BDBT

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: -0.23%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 1Y: 2.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.19%

STRN

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 0.53%
• 6M: 18.64%
• YTD: 23.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	$774.67K	$800.04K	$1.18M
STRN SMART Trend 25 ETF	$281.16K	$307.92K	$326.31K

BDBT vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	-0.13%	2.44%
STRN SMART Trend 25 ETF	23.95%	10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBT and STRN is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

BDBT vs. STRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BDBT

BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 22
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

STRN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BDBT vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and SMART Trend 25 ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDBT	STRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	—	—

Drawdowns

BDBT vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum STRN drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and STRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDBT	STRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-15.43%	+12.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-5.34%	+3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-3.32%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDBT	STRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.80%	27.26%	-23.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.87%	27.26%	-23.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.87%	27.26%	-23.39%

BDBT vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDBT vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison

BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than STRN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.95%	2.21%
STRN SMART Trend 25 ETF	0.15%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDBT and STRN in my portfolio?

BDBT and STRN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BDBT or STRN?

On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDBT or STRN?

BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for STRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDBT or STRN?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.15% for STRN.

What is the main difference between BDBT and STRN?

BDBT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while STRN is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.59% for STRN.