BDBT vs. PGRI
BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) and PGRI (Putnam International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while PGRI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Putnam. Both are actively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BDBT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PGRI.
Performance
BDBT vs. PGRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than PGRI's 9.60% return.
BDBT
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.19%
PGRI
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $774.67K | $800.04K | $1.18M | |
| $3.61K | $1.74K | $14.22K |
BDBT vs. PGRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF | -0.13% | -0.30% |
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF | 9.60% | -1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDBT and PGRI is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDBT vs. PGRI — Risk / Return Rank
BDBT
PGRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDBT vs. PGRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDBT | PGRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDBT vs. PGRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum PGRI drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and PGRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDBT | PGRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -12.87% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -2.70% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -3.28% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | — | — |
Volatility
BDBT vs. PGRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDBT | PGRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 20.73% | -16.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 20.73% | -16.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 20.73% | -16.86% |
BDBT vs. PGRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PGRI's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDBT vs. PGRI - Dividend Comparison
BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than PGRI's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF | 3.95% | 2.21% |
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF | 0.11% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDBT and PGRI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRI.
BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.11% for PGRI.
BDBT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while PGRI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.55% for PGRI.
Find the right allocation for BDBT and PGRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer