BDBT vs. OEI
BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) and OEI (Optimized Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while OEI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Core Alternative. Both are actively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BDBT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OEI.
Performance
BDBT vs. OEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than OEI's 7.57% return.
BDBT
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.19%
OEI
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $774.67K | $800.04K | $1.18M | |
| $105.90K | $117.49K | $153.59K |
BDBT vs. OEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF | -0.13% | -0.30% |
OEI Optimized Equity Income ETF | 7.57% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDBT and OEI is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDBT vs. OEI — Risk / Return Rank
BDBT
OEI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDBT vs. OEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and Optimized Equity Income ETF (OEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDBT | OEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDBT vs. OEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum OEI drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and OEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDBT | OEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -6.49% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | 0.00% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -1.00% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | — | — |
Volatility
BDBT vs. OEI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDBT | OEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 9.89% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 9.89% | -6.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 9.89% | -6.02% |
BDBT vs. OEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than OEI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDBT vs. OEI - Dividend Comparison
BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than OEI's 6.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF | 3.95% | 2.21% |
OEI Optimized Equity Income ETF | 6.65% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDBT and OEI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for OEI.
OEI has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 3.95% for BDBT.
BDBT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while OEI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Core Alternative. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.75% for OEI.
Find the right allocation for BDBT and OEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer