BDBT vs. EDGF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) and EDGF (3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDBT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for EDGF.

Performance

BDBT vs. EDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than EDGF's 0.90% return.

BDBT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EDGF

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 3.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDBT vs. EDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	0.09%	3.68%
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	0.90%	1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBT and EDGF is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.59

BDBT vs. EDGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDBT	EDGF
Financial Services	100.0%	99.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BDBT vs. EDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGF

EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 69
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDBT vs. EDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDBT	EDGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.98	+0.07

Drawdowns

BDBT vs. EDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, which is greater than EDGF's maximum drawdown of -1.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and EDGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDBT	EDGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-1.62%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-0.07%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-0.46%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDBT	EDGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83%	1.94%	+1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.83%	2.35%	+1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.83%	2.35%	+1.48%

BDBT vs. EDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGF's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDBT vs. EDGF - Dividend Comparison

BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than EDGF's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.53%	2.21%	0.00%
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	3.45%	3.61%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDBT and EDGF in my portfolio?

BDBT and EDGF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BDBT or EDGF?

On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDBT or EDGF?

BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDBT or EDGF?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 3.45% for EDGF.

What is the main difference between BDBT and EDGF?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.79% for EDGF.