BCSVX vs. EMXC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BCSVX (Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both funds - BCSVX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Brown Capital Management, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Over the past 5 years, BCSVX returned -3.92%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for EMXC. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCSVX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

BCSVX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSVX achieves a -12.20% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 32.33% return.

BCSVX

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -12.20%
• 6M: -13.19%
• 1Y: -21.09%
• 3Y*: 0.19%
• 5Y*: -3.92%
• 10Y*: 7.11%

EMXC

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: 32.33%
• 6M: 36.39%
• 1Y: 62.72%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 11.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSVX vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	-12.20%	-2.30%	8.17%	20.04%	-31.56%	12.69%	44.75%	26.41%	-3.39%	12.32%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	32.33%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSVX and EMXC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017	0.56

The correlation between BCSVX and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BCSVX vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSVX

BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 86
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSVX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCSVX	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	2.71	-3.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.71	3.27	-4.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.50	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	4.37	-5.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	17.27	-18.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCSVX vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSVX Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSVX and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCSVX	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.24	2.71	-3.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.65	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.50	-0.06

Drawdowns

BCSVX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSVX drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSVX and EMXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCSVX	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.93%	-42.81%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.35%	-14.41%	-17.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.35%	-19.12%	-13.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.93%	-28.91%	-15.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.86%	-7.55%	-19.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-10.19%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.02%	3.64%	+13.38%

Volatility

BCSVX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) is 5.37%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.57%. This indicates that BCSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCSVX	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	12.57%	-7.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.96%	21.20%	-7.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	23.27%	-6.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	17.82%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	19.99%	-2.85%

BCSVX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSVX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCSVX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

BCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than EMXC's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.07%	0.74%	0.30%	0.31%	0.00%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.13%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCSVX and EMXC in my portfolio?

BCSVX and EMXC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCSVX or EMXC?

EMXC has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to BCSVX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSVX dropped -43.93% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.