PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSIX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCSIX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCSIX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCSIX
Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund
-21.99%-57.15%9.86%19.16%-37.85%-4.26%45.23%29.22%-0.57%28.90%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
-6.77%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSIX achieves a -21.99% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BCSIX has underperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of -3.29%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.


BCSIX

1D
0.59%
1M
-8.96%
YTD
-21.99%
6M
-62.81%
1Y
-60.19%
3Y*
-26.21%
5Y*
-22.62%
10Y*
-3.29%

VRTGX

1D
-2.00%
1M
-10.13%
YTD
-6.77%
6M
-5.62%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BCSIX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BCSIX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSIX
BCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSIX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCSIXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.06

0.71

-1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.26

1.15

-2.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.65

1.14

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

1.02

-1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.98

3.52

-5.51

BCSIX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSIX Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSIX and VRTGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCSIXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.06

0.71

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

0.03

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

0.39

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.45

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between BCSIX and VRTGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BCSIX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

BCSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCSIX
Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund
0.00%0.00%52.70%9.36%12.04%9.32%7.46%8.62%6.85%5.94%5.54%9.15%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.77%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Drawdowns

BCSIX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSIX drawdown since its inception was -79.03%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSIX and VRTGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSIXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.03%

-41.97%

-37.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.24%

-14.80%

-49.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.03%

-40.48%

-38.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.03%

-41.97%

-37.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.90%

-14.80%

-64.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-10.53%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.84%

4.30%

+26.54%

Volatility

BCSIX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund (BCSIX) is 6.52%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that BCSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCSIXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

7.60%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.03%

16.04%

+58.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.33%

25.09%

+33.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.44%

24.47%

+20.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.22%

24.41%

+11.81%