BCOSX vs. TIBDX
BCOSX (Baird Core Plus Bond Fund) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, BCOSX returned 2.07%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for TIBDX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCOSX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.
Performance
BCOSX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCOSX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than TIBDX's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BCOSX has outperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
BCOSX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
TIBDX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
BCOSX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCOSX Baird Core Plus Bond Fund | 0.32% | 7.22% | 2.26% | 6.60% | -13.09% | -1.23% | 8.59% | 9.69% | -0.74% | 4.47% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 0.34% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | -0.95% | 8.10% | 9.57% | -0.64% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCOSX and TIBDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2000 | 0.91 |
The correlation between BCOSX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCOSX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
BCOSX
TIBDX
BCOSX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOSX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCOSX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.72 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | 5.09 | -0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCOSX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCOSX drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, roughly equal to the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOSX and TIBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCOSX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.39% | -18.82% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -2.98% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.80% | -6.29% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.39% | -18.82% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.39% | -18.82% | +0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.54% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -2.30% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.01% | -0.08% |
Volatility
BCOSX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOSX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) have volatilities of 1.10% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCOSX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 2.95% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 3.88% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 5.64% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 4.74% | -0.08% |
BCOSX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCOSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCOSX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
BCOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than TIBDX's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCOSX Baird Core Plus Bond Fund | 3.87% | 3.75% | 3.68% | 3.17% | 2.69% | 2.57% | 3.11% | 2.60% | 2.75% | 2.47% | 2.27% | 2.49% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.46% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, BCOSX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TIBDX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to BCOSX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCOSX dropped -18.39% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.
TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCOSX and TIBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer