BCOM.L vs. MINT.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BCOM.L (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF) and MINT.L (PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - BCOM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while MINT.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. BCOM.L is passively managed, while MINT.L is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCOM.L returned 10.55%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for MINT.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCOM.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MINT.L.

Performance

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOM.L achieves a 21.11% return, which is significantly higher than MINT.L's 2.37% return.

BCOM.L

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 2.57%
• 6M: 17.34%
• YTD: 21.11%
• 1Y: 30.23%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: —

MINT.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 2.11%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.52%
• 3Y*: 5.21%
• 5Y*: 3.48%
• 10Y*: 2.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCOM.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF	21.11%	16.19%	4.43%	-7.25%	15.63%	27.35%	-2.99%	5.14%	-9.87%	6.89%
MINT.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.37%	4.66%	5.75%	5.72%	-0.67%	-0.09%	1.30%	3.28%	1.65%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BCOM.L and MINT.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2017	0.01

The correlation between BCOM.L and MINT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOM.L

BCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
BCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

MINT.L

MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCOM.L	MINT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	7.81	-6.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	16.76	-14.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	3.53	-2.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	45.23	-43.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	230.58	-223.98

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the MINT.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOM.L and MINT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.65%, which is greater than MINT.L's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOM.L and MINT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCOM.L	MINT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.65%	-3.89%	-27.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-0.10%	-14.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.33%	-0.62%	-13.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.27%	-2.47%	-23.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-3.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.13%	-0.03%	-8.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.63%	-0.23%	-11.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.52%	0.02%	+4.50%

Volatility

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that BCOM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCOM.L	MINT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	0.14%	+3.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.82%	0.36%	+14.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.93%	0.58%	+16.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	0.76%	+16.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.34%	0.95%	+14.39%

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOM.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCOM.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison

BCOM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCOM.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	4.01%	4.43%	5.18%	4.81%	1.51%	0.34%	1.17%	2.63%	2.33%	1.56%	1.31%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCOM.L and MINT.L in my portfolio?

BCOM.L and MINT.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCOM.L or MINT.L?

On fees, BCOM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCOM.L or MINT.L?

BCOM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINT.L.

What is the main difference between BCOM.L and MINT.L?

BCOM.L is categorized as Commodities, while MINT.L is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: L&G and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BCOM.L and 0.35% for MINT.L.