BCLO vs. STPZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BCLO (iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF) and STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCLO is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLOIE High Quality Mezzanine Index, while STPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BCLO returned 6.78% vs 4.42% for STPZ. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. BCLO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for STPZ.

Performance

BCLO vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCLO achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than STPZ's 1.79% return.

BCLO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: 3.15%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STPZ

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: 5.03%
• 5Y*: 2.94%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCLO vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCLO iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF	2.74%	5.43%
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF	1.79%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BCLO and STPZ is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025	-0.06

The correlation between BCLO and STPZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCLO vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCLO

BCLO Risk / Return Rank: 85
BCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

STPZ

STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 80
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 78
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCLO vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCLO	STPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	2.43	+0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.33	3.85	+1.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	1.47	+0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	4.67	-1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.32	15.65	-2.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCLO vs. STPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCLO Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the STPZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCLO and STPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCLO	STPZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	2.43	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	0.90	+0.51

Drawdowns

BCLO vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCLO drawdown since its inception was -4.45%, smaller than the maximum STPZ drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCLO and STPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCLO	STPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-6.77%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.92%	-0.93%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-6.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-6.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-1.31%	+0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	0.28%	+0.24%

Volatility

BCLO vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) at 0.46%. This indicates that BCLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCLO	STPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.66%	0.46%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	1.20%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03%	1.83%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.40%	3.29%	+1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.40%	2.98%	+1.42%

BCLO vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCLO vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison

BCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than STPZ's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCLO iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF	6.59%	6.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF	4.10%	3.65%	1.97%	1.63%	5.88%	3.65%	1.86%	1.76%	2.23%	1.51%	0.65%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCLO and STPZ in my portfolio?

BCLO and STPZ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCLO or STPZ?

BCLO has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to STPZ (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCLO dropped -4.45% vs STPZ's -6.77%.

Which ETF is better, BCLO or STPZ?

On 1-year performance, BCLO leads with 6.78% vs 4.42% for STPZ. On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, STPZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCLO or STPZ?

Over the 1-year period, BCLO has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCLO or STPZ?

STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BCLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCLO or STPZ?

BCLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 4.10% for STPZ.

What is the main difference between BCLO and STPZ?

BCLO is categorized as CLO, while STPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BCLO tracks JP Morgan CLOIE High Quality Mezzanine Index, while STPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BCLO and 0.20% for STPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.