BCLO vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BCLO (iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF) and CLOZ (Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF) are both CLO funds. BCLO is passively managed, while CLOZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BCLO returned 6.78% vs 6.17% for CLOZ. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCLO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

BCLO vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCLO achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's 2.55% return.

BCLO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: 3.15%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOZ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 6.17%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCLO vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCLO iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF	2.74%	5.43%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	2.55%	4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BCLO and CLOZ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

BCLO vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCLO

BCLO Risk / Return Rank: 85
BCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 48
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCLO vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCLO	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	1.79	+1.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.33	2.29	+3.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	1.45	+0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	1.56	+2.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.32	5.19	+8.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCLO vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCLO Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCLO and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCLO	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	1.79	+1.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	2.77	-1.36

Drawdowns

BCLO vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCLO drawdown since its inception was -4.45%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCLO and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCLO	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-5.32%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.92%	-3.90%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-0.38%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	1.17%	-0.65%

Volatility

BCLO vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.55%. This indicates that BCLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCLO	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.66%	0.55%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	3.13%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03%	3.45%	-1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.40%	3.81%	+0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.40%	3.81%	+0.59%

BCLO vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCLO vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

BCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, less than CLOZ's 8.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BCLO iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF	6.59%	6.45%	0.00%	0.00%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	8.01%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCLO and CLOZ in my portfolio?

BCLO and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCLO or CLOZ?

BCLO has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to CLOZ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCLO dropped -4.45% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, BCLO or CLOZ?

On 1-year performance, BCLO leads with 6.78% vs 6.17% for CLOZ. On fees, BCLO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CLOZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCLO or CLOZ?

Over the 1-year period, BCLO has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCLO or CLOZ?

BCLO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCLO or CLOZ?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.01%, compared with 6.59% for BCLO.

What is the main difference between BCLO and CLOZ?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Panagram. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BCLO and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.