BCKT vs. VGLT
BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) and VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. BCKT is actively managed, while VGLT is passively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BCKT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGLT.
Performance
BCKT vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCKT achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than VGLT's -3.26% return.
BCKT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 1Y
- -1.67%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- -7.07%
- 10Y*
- -1.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.12K | $7.01K | $9.67K | |
| $95.69M | $98.86M | $108.97M |
BCKT vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 0.52% | 1.09% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -3.26% | -0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCKT and VGLT is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCKT vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank
BCKT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGLT
BCKT vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCKT | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCKT vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and VGLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCKT | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -46.18% | +45.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -38.64% | +38.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -15.26% | +14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility
BCKT vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCKT | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54% | 8.47% | -6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.54% | 14.45% | -12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.54% | 13.75% | -12.21% |
BCKT vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCKT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCKT vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison
BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.32%, more than VGLT's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 20.32% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.37% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCKT and VGLT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BCKT.
BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 20.32%, compared with 4.37% for VGLT.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCKT and 0.03% for VGLT.
Find the right allocation for BCKT and VGLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer