BCKT vs. VGIT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) and VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. BCKT is actively managed, while VGIT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCKT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGIT.

Performance

BCKT vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCKT achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.32% return.

BCKT

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VGIT

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 3.19%
• 3Y*: 3.44%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 1.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCKT vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF	0.36%	1.09%
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF	-0.32%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BCKT and VGIT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

BCKT vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGIT

VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 26
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 25
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCKT vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCKT	VGIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.50	+0.90

Drawdowns

BCKT vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum VGIT drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and VGIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCKT	VGIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-16.05%	+15.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-2.26%	+1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.26%	-3.52%	+3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCKT	VGIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53%	3.38%	-1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.53%	5.38%	-3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.53%	4.50%	-2.97%

BCKT vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCKT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BCKT vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison

BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, more than VGIT's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF	17.95%	5.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF	3.86%	3.79%	3.67%	2.73%	1.74%	1.69%	2.23%	2.24%	2.05%	1.67%	1.69%	1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCKT and VGIT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, BCKT and VGIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BCKT or VGIT?

On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCKT or VGIT?

VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BCKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCKT or VGIT?

BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 3.86% for VGIT.

What is the main difference between BCKT and VGIT?

They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCKT and 0.03% for VGIT.