BCKT vs. LIAM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) and LIAM (LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCKT is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while LIAM is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

BCKT vs. LIAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCKT achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than LIAM's 0.89% return.

BCKT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LIAM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 6M: -0.23%
• 1Y: 4.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCKT vs. LIAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF	0.31%	1.09%
LIAM LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	0.89%	-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BCKT and LIAM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025	0.67

Return for Risk

BCKT vs. LIAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIAM

LIAM Risk / Return Rank: 22
LIAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
LIAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
LIAM Omega Ratio Rank: 21
LIAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
LIAM Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCKT vs. LIAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCKT	LIAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	-0.10	+1.44

Drawdowns

BCKT vs. LIAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum LIAM drawdown of -8.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and LIAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCKT	LIAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-8.39%	+7.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-2.06%	+1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.26%	-3.36%	+3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCKT	LIAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53%	6.39%	-4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.53%	7.66%	-6.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.53%	7.66%	-6.13%

BCKT vs. LIAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCKT and LIAM have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BCKT vs. LIAM - Dividend Comparison

BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.96%, more than LIAM's 6.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF	17.96%	5.36%	0.00%
LIAM LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	6.44%	9.02%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCKT and LIAM in my portfolio?

BCKT and LIAM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCKT or LIAM?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCKT or LIAM?

BCKT and LIAM have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCKT or LIAM?

BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 17.96%, compared with 6.44% for LIAM.

What is the main difference between BCKT and LIAM?

BCKT is categorized as Government Bonds, while LIAM is Inflation-Protected Bonds.