BCKT vs. GBIL

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. BCKT is actively managed, while GBIL is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCKT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.

Performance

BCKT vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCKT achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.79% return.

BCKT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.71%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 4.60%
• 5Y*: 3.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCKT vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF	0.49%	1.09%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	1.79%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BCKT and GBIL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

BCKT vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCKT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCKT vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCKT	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	16.87	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	109.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	48.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	192.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1,697.29	—

Drawdowns

BCKT vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCKT	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-0.76%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	0.00%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-0.04%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCKT	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56%	0.23%	+1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.56%	0.58%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.56%	0.47%	+1.09%

BCKT vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCKT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BCKT vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.32%, more than GBIL's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF	20.32%	5.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.71%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCKT and GBIL in my portfolio?

BCKT and GBIL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCKT or GBIL?

On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCKT or GBIL?

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BCKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCKT or GBIL?

BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 20.32%, compared with 3.71% for GBIL.

What is the main difference between BCKT and GBIL?

They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCKT and 0.12% for GBIL.