BCKT vs. EDV
BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) and EDV (Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. BCKT is actively managed, while EDV is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCKT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for EDV.
Performance
BCKT vs. EDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCKT achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than EDV's -1.80% return.
BCKT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDV
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- -4.80%
- 5Y*
- -11.37%
- 10Y*
- -4.18%
BCKT vs. EDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 0.49% | 1.09% |
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | -1.80% | -2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCKT and EDV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCKT vs. EDV — Risk / Return Rank
BCKT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDV
BCKT vs. EDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCKT | EDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCKT vs. EDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum EDV drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and EDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCKT | EDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -59.96% | +58.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -54.94% | +54.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -23.59% | +23.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.79% | — |
Volatility
BCKT vs. EDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCKT | EDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56% | 14.24% | -12.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 21.56% | -20.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 19.76% | -18.20% |
BCKT vs. EDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCKT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EDV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCKT vs. EDV - Dividend Comparison
BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.32%, more than EDV's 5.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 20.32% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | 5.20% | 4.94% | 4.65% | 3.81% | 3.28% | 1.95% | 5.54% | 3.51% | 2.90% | 2.92% | 5.32% | 4.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCKT and EDV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BCKT.
BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 20.32%, compared with 5.20% for EDV.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCKT and 0.05% for EDV.
Find the right allocation for BCKT and EDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer