BCKT vs. BNDD
BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCKT charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.
Performance
BCKT vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCKT achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 4.40% return.
BCKT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- -3.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCKT vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 0.36% | 1.09% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 4.40% | -2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCKT and BNDD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCKT vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank
BCKT
BNDD
BCKT vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCKT | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | -0.33 | +1.73 |
Drawdowns
BCKT vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and BNDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCKT | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -30.87% | +29.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -26.45% | +25.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -19.33% | +19.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility
BCKT vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCKT | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53% | 10.62% | -9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.53% | 13.38% | -11.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.53% | 13.38% | -11.85% |
BCKT vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCKT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCKT vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison
BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, more than BNDD's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 17.95% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 3.60% | 3.82% | 3.85% | 4.30% | 43.17% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCKT and BNDD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCKT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCKT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.
BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 3.60% for BNDD.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCKT and 1.02% for BNDD.
Find the right allocation for BCKT and BNDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer