BCIM vs. FTSD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCIM (abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCIM is a Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Industrial Metals, while FTSD is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. BCIM is passively managed, while FTSD is actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCIM charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.

Performance

BCIM vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCIM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTSD

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 4.31%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 2.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCIM vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF	0.00%	10.71%	3.30%	-9.68%	-3.29%	4.17%
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF	0.80%	5.66%	5.20%	4.84%	-3.13%	-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BCIM and FTSD is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021	0.02

Return for Risk

BCIM vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSD

FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 95
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCIM vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCIM	FTSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.04	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BCIM	FTSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.32%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-5.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.12%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.60%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCIM	FTSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.31%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.85%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.79%	—

BCIM vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCIM has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCIM vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison

BCIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than FTSD's 4.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF	3.77%	3.77%	11.47%	3.36%	0.72%	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF	4.50%	4.67%	4.75%	4.14%	1.73%	1.01%	1.54%	2.90%	2.63%	2.24%	1.92%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCIM and FTSD in my portfolio?

BCIM and FTSD have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCIM or FTSD?

On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCIM or FTSD?

FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for BCIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCIM or FTSD?

FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.77% for BCIM.

What is the main difference between BCIM and FTSD?

BCIM is categorized as Metals, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for BCIM and 0.25% for FTSD.