BCIM vs. AFSC
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) and abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC).
BCIM and AFSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCIM is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Industrial Metals. It was launched on Sep 22, 2021. AFSC is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 29, 2004.
Performance
BCIM vs. AFSC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCIM vs. AFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 0.00% | 4.65% |
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF | 2.27% | 2.67% |
Returns By Period
BCIM
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFSC
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 17.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCIM vs. AFSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCIM has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than AFSC's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCIM vs. AFSC — Risk / Return Rank
BCIM
AFSC
BCIM vs. AFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) and abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCIM | AFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.20 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between BCIM and AFSC is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BCIM vs. AFSC - Dividend Comparison
BCIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than AFSC's 0.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 3.77% | 3.77% | 11.47% | 3.36% | 0.72% | 1.57% |
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF | 0.08% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BCIM vs. AFSC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCIM | AFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -21.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -6.17% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.57% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility
BCIM vs. AFSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCIM | AFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.60% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.98% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.98% | — |