BCI vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
BCI and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCI is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000.
Performance
BCI vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCI vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 24.37% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 2.94% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | -4.38% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 14.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 24.37% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's -4.38% return.
BCI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 24.37%
- 6M
- 31.23%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -4.38%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCI vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BCI vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
BCI
IVV
BCI vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.97 | +0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.49 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 1.53 | +1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 7.32 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.97 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCI and IVV is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BCI vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%, more than IVV's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.26% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Drawdowns
BCI vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and IVV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.69% | -55.25% | +22.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -12.06% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.50% | -24.53% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.26% | +6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -10.85% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.53% | +0.84% |
Volatility
BCI vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 5.30%. This indicates that BCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 5.30% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.57% | 9.45% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 18.31% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 16.89% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 18.04% | -2.47% |