BCHI vs. PRXV

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BCHI (GMO Beyond China ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCHI is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by GMO, while PRXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Praxis. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.

Performance

BCHI vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCHI

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: 29.54%
• 6M: 29.99%
• 1Y: 51.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRXV

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 4.07%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHI vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	9.29%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	7.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHI and PRXV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

BCHI vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHI

BCHI Risk / Return Rank: 81
BCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

PRXV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHI vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCHI	PRXV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.99	—	—

Drawdowns

BCHI vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHI drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHI and PRXV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHI	PRXV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.33%	-1.41%	-12.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.74%	0.00%	-5.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-0.40%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCHI	PRXV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	10.69%	+11.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.22%	10.69%	+11.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.22%	10.69%	+11.53%

BCHI vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHI vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison

BCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	2.83%	3.67%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHI and PRXV in my portfolio?

BCHI and PRXV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCHI or PRXV?

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHI or PRXV?

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCHI or PRXV?

BCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

What is the main difference between BCHI and PRXV?

BCHI is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while PRXV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: GMO and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHI and 0.36% for PRXV.