BCHI vs. EMEQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BCHI (GMO Beyond China ETF) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCHI returned 62.50% vs 154.82% for EMEQ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

BCHI vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHI achieves a 34.99% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 74.89% return.

BCHI

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 34.99%
• 6M: 37.70%
• 1Y: 62.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMEQ

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 16.61%
• YTD: 74.89%
• 6M: 86.91%
• 1Y: 154.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHI vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	34.99%	25.80%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	74.89%	56.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHI and EMEQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.79

The correlation between BCHI and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BCHI vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHI

BCHI Risk / Return Rank: 89
BCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHI vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCHI	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	4.85	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.18	5.00	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.71	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.44	8.70	-4.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.90	34.77	-16.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCHI vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 4.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHI and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCHI	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	4.85	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.45	2.87	-0.42

Drawdowns

BCHI vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHI drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, smaller than the maximum EMEQ drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHI and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHI	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.33%	-19.99%	+5.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.14%	-17.91%	+3.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-3.05%	+1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-3.97%	+1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	4.47%	-0.97%

Volatility

BCHI vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) is 9.56%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that BCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCHI	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.56%	15.07%	-5.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.73%	28.60%	-10.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.88%	32.17%	-12.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	29.97%	-9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	29.97%	-9.40%

BCHI vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHI vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

BCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than EMEQ's 1.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	2.72%	3.67%	0.00%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.58%	2.76%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHI and EMEQ in my portfolio?

BCHI and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCHI or EMEQ?

EMEQ has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to BCHI (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHI dropped -14.33% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

Which ETF is better, BCHI or EMEQ?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 154.82% vs 62.50% for BCHI. On fees, BCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BCHI has been the lower-risk option at 9.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCHI or EMEQ?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 154.82% return vs 62.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHI or EMEQ?

BCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCHI or EMEQ?

BCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.58% for EMEQ.

What is the main difference between BCHI and EMEQ?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHI and 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.