PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCHI vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCHI vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHI achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.73% return.


BCHI

1D
-1.08%
1M
-9.22%
6M
14.33%
YTD
20.35%
1Y
35.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.52%
6M
36.51%
YTD
24.73%
1Y
64.56%
3Y*
-31.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHI vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCHI
GMO Beyond China ETF
20.35%26.33%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
24.73%2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHI and BITI is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCHI vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHI
BCHI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHI vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCHIBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.57

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

6.36

+1.99

BCHI vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHI and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCHI vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHI drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHI and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCHIBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.33%

-92.16%

+77.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-25.28%

+11.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.43%

-86.38%

+73.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-68.42%

+65.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

10.18%

-5.89%

Volatility

BCHI vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) is 9.76%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that BCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCHIBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

10.69%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.86%

34.09%

-12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.47%

44.07%

-20.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

52.21%

-29.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.59%

52.21%

-29.62%

BCHI vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCHI vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

BCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than BITI's 15.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BCHI
GMO Beyond China ETF
3.70%3.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.59%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCHI and BITI have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to BCHI (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHI dropped -14.33% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.56% vs 35.76% for BCHI. On fees, BCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BCHI has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.56% return vs 35.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.59%, compared with 3.70% for BCHI.

BCHI is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: GMO and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHI and 1.03% for BITI.

BCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCHI and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer