PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCHI vs. AVEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCHI vs. AVEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHI achieves a 35.93% return, which is significantly higher than AVEE's 15.61% return.


BCHI

1D
-0.82%
1M
6.18%
YTD
35.93%
6M
37.59%
1Y
64.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVEE

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.28%
YTD
15.61%
6M
16.08%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHI vs. AVEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCHI
GMO Beyond China ETF
35.93%26.33%
AVEE
Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF
15.61%19.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHI and AVEE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.85

The correlation between BCHI and AVEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCHI vs. AVEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHI
BCHI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEE
AVEE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AVEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHI vs. AVEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCHIAVEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.29

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

2.59

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.73

8.06

+9.67

BCHI vs. AVEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the AVEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHI and AVEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCHI vs. AVEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHI drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, smaller than the maximum AVEE drawdown of -20.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHI and AVEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCHIAVEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.33%

-20.21%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-10.65%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-1.03%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-3.67%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.41%

+0.25%

Volatility

BCHI vs. AVEE - Volatility Comparison

GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE) at 8.27%. This indicates that BCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCHIAVEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

8.27%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.96%

15.58%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.88%

17.89%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.77%

17.04%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

17.04%

+4.73%

BCHI vs. AVEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEE's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCHI vs. AVEE - Dividend Comparison

BCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than AVEE's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVEE
Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF
2.66%2.25%3.26%0.39%
BCHI
GMO Beyond China ETF
2.70%3.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCHI and AVEE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCHI has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to AVEE (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHI dropped -14.33% vs AVEE's -20.21%.

On 1-year performance, BCHI leads with 64.74% vs 27.40% for AVEE. On fees, AVEE is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, AVEE has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BCHI has performed better with a 64.74% return vs 27.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEE is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHI.

BCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 2.66% for AVEE.

They also come from different issuers: GMO and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHI and 0.42% for AVEE.

BCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCHI and AVEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer