PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BCFU.DE is traded in USD, while SXRS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SXRS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFU.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly lower than SXRS.DE's 22.41% return.


BCFU.DE

1D
-1.18%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
17.70%
6M
20.17%
1Y
32.61%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*

SXRS.DE

1D
-1.44%
1M
-3.71%
YTD
22.41%
6M
24.07%
1Y
37.52%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BCFU.DE
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
17.70%19.44%4.91%-5.62%16.93%32.04%1.23%6.92%-10.36%
SXRS.DE
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.41%18.23%4.61%-7.61%14.04%28.96%-4.90%7.40%-11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFU.DE and SXRS.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018

0.91

The correlation between BCFU.DE and SXRS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCFU.DE
BCFU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BCFU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCFU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCFU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BCFU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCFU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRS.DE
SXRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SXRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCFU.DESXRS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.38

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

4.95

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.49

11.48

+2.01

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCFU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the SXRS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCFU.DE and SXRS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCFU.DESXRS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.09

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.64

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.50

+0.19

Drawdowns

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.81%, smaller than the maximum SXRS.DE drawdown of -33.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFU.DE and SXRS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFU.DESXRS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.81%

-33.05%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-7.54%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.73%

-11.46%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.29%

-26.46%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-5.55%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.95%

-13.36%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.26%

-0.85%

Volatility

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) is 4.57%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that BCFU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFU.DESXRS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.75%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

16.10%

-3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.96%

17.85%

-3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

17.07%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.55%

15.82%

-1.27%

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRS.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCFU.DE vs. SXRS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCFU.DE nor SXRS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BCFU.DE and SXRS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SXRS.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRS.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFU.DE.

BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while SXRS.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFU.DE and 0.19% for SXRS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFU.DE and SXRS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer