BCFU.DE vs. GLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCFU.DE returned 12.00%/yr vs 18.35%/yr for GLD. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCFU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.

Performance

BCFU.DE vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFU.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 3.77% return.

BCFU.DE

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 17.70%
• 6M: 20.17%
• 1Y: 32.61%
• 3Y*: 14.58%
• 5Y*: 12.00%
• 10Y*: —

GLD

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 3.77%
• 6M: 6.24%
• 1Y: 32.28%
• 3Y*: 31.19%
• 5Y*: 18.35%
• 10Y*: 13.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFU.DE vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	17.70%	19.44%	4.91%	-5.62%	16.93%	32.04%	1.23%	6.92%	-6.42%	5.98%
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	3.77%	63.68%	26.66%	12.69%	-0.77%	-4.15%	24.81%	17.86%	-1.94%	2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFU.DE and GLD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017	0.30

Return for Risk

BCFU.DE vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCFU.DE

BCFU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
BCFU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BCFU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BCFU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BCFU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BCFU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 73

GLD

GLD Risk / Return Rank: 34
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFU.DE vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCFU.DE	GLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	1.22	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	1.61	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.24	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.21	1.69	+3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.49	4.15	+9.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCFU.DE vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCFU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCFU.DE and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCFU.DE	GLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	1.22	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	1.02	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.60	+0.09

Drawdowns

BCFU.DE vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.81%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFU.DE and GLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCFU.DE	GLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.81%	-45.56%	+16.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	-19.21%	+12.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.73%	-19.21%	+8.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.29%	-21.03%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.34%	-17.07%	+12.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.95%	-16.16%	+4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	7.81%	-5.40%

Volatility

BCFU.DE vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) is 4.57%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that BCFU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCFU.DE	GLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	5.50%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.16%	23.16%	-11.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.96%	26.60%	-12.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.36%	18.00%	-1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.55%	15.95%	-1.40%

BCFU.DE vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCFU.DE vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCFU.DE nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCFU.DE and GLD in my portfolio?

BCFU.DE and GLD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCFU.DE or GLD?

On fees, BCFU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCFU.DE or GLD?

BCFU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

What is the main difference between BCFU.DE and GLD?

BCFU.DE is categorized as Commodities, while GLD is Gold. BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFU.DE and 0.40% for GLD.