BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE
BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and EMEH.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR) are both Commodities funds - BCFU.DE tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity while EMEH.DE tracks the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCFU.DE returned 12.00%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for EMEH.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCFU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMEH.DE.
Performance
BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BCFU.DE is traded in USD, while EMEH.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMEH.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFU.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly lower than EMEH.DE's 19.93% return.
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
EMEH.DE
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 19.93%
- 6M
- 24.62%
- 1Y
- 46.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- —
BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 17.70% | 19.44% | 4.91% | -5.62% | 16.93% | 32.04% | 1.23% | 6.92% | -6.42% | 1.07% |
EMEH.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR | 19.93% | 41.56% | 0.53% | -9.49% | 5.02% | 17.08% | 4.92% | 5.35% | -90.57% | 6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFU.DE and EMEH.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between BCFU.DE and EMEH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFU.DE
EMEH.DE
BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFU.DE | EMEH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | 4.63 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | 15.61 | -2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFU.DE | EMEH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.46 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.50 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | -0.46 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.81%, smaller than the maximum EMEH.DE drawdown of -93.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFU.DE and EMEH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFU.DE | EMEH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.81% | -93.42% | +64.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -10.04% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.73% | -14.42% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -32.67% | +6.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -81.49% | +77.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -82.55% | +70.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.98% | -0.57% |
Volatility
BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFU.DE | EMEH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.54% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 16.59% | -4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.96% | 18.87% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 20.31% | -3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 35.51% | -20.96% |
BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEH.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFU.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCFU.DE nor EMEH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFU.DE and EMEH.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCFU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.
BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFU.DE and 0.39% for EMEH.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFU.DE and EMEH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer