BCEM vs. TJUN

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

BCEM (Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - BCEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). BCEM is actively managed, while TJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BCEM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.

Performance

BCEM vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF (BCEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCEM

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -5.36%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

TJUN

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -3.47%
• 6M: -4.22%
• YTD: -1.94%
• 1Y: 5.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCEM Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF	$108.38K	$126.63K	$170.35K
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	$26.73K	$108.76K	$112.55K

BCEM vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCEM Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF	3.19%
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	-4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BCEM and TJUN is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026	0.81

Return for Risk

BCEM vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCEM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TJUN

TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 25
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCEM vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF (BCEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCEM	TJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.71	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.83	—

Drawdowns

BCEM vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCEM drawdown since its inception was -12.06%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -7.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCEM and TJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCEM	TJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.06%	-7.80%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.92%	-7.27%	-3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-0.98%	-2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCEM	TJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.58%	10.14%	+22.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.58%	9.94%	+22.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.58%	9.94%	+22.64%

BCEM vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCEM vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCEM nor TJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCEM and TJUN in my portfolio?

BCEM and TJUN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCEM or TJUN?

On fees, BCEM is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCEM or TJUN?

BCEM is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCEM or TJUN?

BCEM and TJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BCEM and TJUN?

BCEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCEM and 0.95% for TJUN.