BCE.TO vs. TF.TO
BCE.TO (BCE Inc.) and TF.TO (Timbercreek Financial Corp.) are both stocks. BCE.TO operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while TF.TO operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, BCE.TO returned -4.80%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for TF.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCE.TO achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly higher than TF.TO's 0.53% return.
BCE.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 16.92%
- 3Y*
- -11.38%
- 5Y*
- -4.80%
- 10Y*
- 0.48%
TF.TO
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- —
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE.TO BCE Inc. | 6.30% | 5.35% | -30.02% | -6.22% | -4.33% | 27.90% | -3.92% | 17.38% | -5.65% | 9.18% |
TF.TO Timbercreek Financial Corp. | 0.53% | 6.58% | 16.09% | 3.20% | -19.62% | 19.59% | -5.44% | 22.00% | -1.96% | 18.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCE.TO and TF.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016 | 0.18 |
The correlation between BCE.TO and TF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BCE.TO:
CA$32.05B
TF.TO:
CA$545.34M
BCE.TO:
CA$6.92
TF.TO:
CA$0.36
BCE.TO:
4.97
TF.TO:
18.15
BCE.TO:
0.01
TF.TO:
0.84
BCE.TO:
1.30
TF.TO:
3.74
BCE.TO:
1.59
TF.TO:
0.83
BCE.TO:
CA$24.71B
TF.TO:
CA$145.73M
BCE.TO:
CA$14.56B
TF.TO:
CA$79.48M
BCE.TO:
CA$14.72B
TF.TO:
CA$55.87M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BCE.TO
TF.TO
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BCE Inc. (BCE.TO) and Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCE.TO | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.98 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | -0.21 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | -0.48 | +3.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -50.02%, which is greater than TF.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCE.TO and TF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCE.TO | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.02% | -40.43% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.82% | -16.36% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.50% | -23.05% | -20.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.02% | -30.99% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.09% | -8.19% | -29.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -6.65% | -4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 7.03% | -1.35% |
Volatility
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO - Volatility Comparison
BCE Inc. (BCE.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO) at 3.57%. This indicates that BCE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCE.TO | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 3.57% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 11.96% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 16.10% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 18.24% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 19.05% | -1.55% |
Dividends
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO - Dividend Comparison
BCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than TF.TO's 10.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE.TO BCE Inc. | 5.09% | 7.06% | 11.97% | 7.42% | 6.19% | 5.32% | 6.12% | 5.27% | 5.60% | 4.75% | 4.70% | 4.86% |
TF.TO Timbercreek Financial Corp. | 10.47% | 10.09% | 9.76% | 10.35% | 9.76% | 7.18% | 7.99% | 6.95% | 7.89% | 7.12% | 3.92% | 0.00% |
Financials
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BCE Inc. and Timbercreek Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCE.TO vs. TF.TO - Profitability Comparison
BCE.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 6.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
TF.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 22.05M and revenue of 39.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.
BCE.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
TF.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 17.68M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.
BCE.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported a net income of 653.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
TF.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a net income of 10.37M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCE.TO and TF.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BCE.TO and TF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer