BCDF vs. BTCZ

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCDF returned 3.72% vs 57.67% for BTCZ. At a correlation of -0.47, they often move in opposite directions. BCDF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.

Performance

BCDF vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCDF achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 39.67% return.

BCDF

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: 4.44%
• 1M: 45.91%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 41.37%
• 1Y: 57.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCDF vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	0.97%	11.63%	14.83%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	39.67%	-29.11%	-76.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BCDF and BTCZ is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024	-0.47

Return for Risk

BCDF vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 12
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCDF vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCDF	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	0.67	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	1.43	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.17	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	1.21	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.98	2.39	-1.41

BCDF vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCDF Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCDF and BTCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCDF vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCDF	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.70%	-91.06%	+63.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.65%	-49.02%	+39.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.65%	-77.48%	+67.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.80%	-73.66%	+63.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	24.81%	-21.06%

Volatility

BCDF vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) is 5.92%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 25.49%. This indicates that BCDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCDF	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	25.49%	-19.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.36%	68.62%	-57.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.08%	88.36%	-73.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	97.10%	-80.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	97.10%	-80.15%

BCDF vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCDF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCDF vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.50%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCDF and BTCZ in my portfolio?

BCDF and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCDF or BTCZ?

BTCZ has higher volatility (25.49%) compared to BCDF (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCDF dropped -27.70% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.

Which ETF is better, BCDF or BTCZ?

On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 57.67% vs 3.72% for BCDF. On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BCDF has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCDF or BTCZ?

Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 57.67% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCDF or BTCZ?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCDF or BTCZ?

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

What is the main difference between BCDF and BTCZ?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BCDF and 0.95% for BTCZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.