BCCL.NEO vs. YCST.NEO
BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and YCST.NEO (Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCL.NEO returned -40.36% vs -7.85% for YCST.NEO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BCCL.NEO vs. YCST.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCL.NEO achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than YCST.NEO's 12.72% return.
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -17.13%
- YTD
- -27.54%
- 6M
- -33.09%
- 1Y
- -40.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCST.NEO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- -7.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCL.NEO vs. YCST.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -27.54% | -6.58% |
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 12.72% | -12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and YCST.NEO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCL.NEO vs. YCST.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
BCCL.NEO
YCST.NEO
BCCL.NEO vs. YCST.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) and Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCCL.NEO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.95 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | -0.40 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -0.81 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCCL.NEO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.92 | -0.38 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | -0.18 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
BCCL.NEO vs. YCST.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -52.47%, which is greater than YCST.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCL.NEO and YCST.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCL.NEO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.47% | -19.70% | -32.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.47% | -19.54% | -32.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.69% | -12.62% | -38.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -8.56% | -13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.80% | 9.91% | +19.89% |
Volatility
BCCL.NEO vs. YCST.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) at 10.33%. This indicates that BCCL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCST.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCL.NEO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 10.33% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.89% | 16.64% | +16.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.98% | 20.54% | +23.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.65% | 25.22% | +18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.65% | 25.22% | +18.43% |
Dividends
BCCL.NEO vs. YCST.NEO - Dividend Comparison
BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.66%, more than YCST.NEO's 14.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 40.66% | 16.02% |
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 14.01% | 10.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCCL.NEO and YCST.NEO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Purpose Investments.
Find the right allocation for BCCL.NEO and YCST.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer